Category talk:Scripting Topics - Revision history

R3vo: wiped 15 year old discussion

2021-05-27T21:18:44Z

wiped 15 year old discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 27 May 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~What happened to all the information that used to be in the Scripting Topics page?~~

	~~[[User:Planck\|Planck]] 20:50, 30 July 2006 (CEST)~~

	~~: It's still there, just check it. Your SB links to <nowiki>[[Scripting Topics]]</nowiki>, not to [[:Category:Scripting Topics]]. --[[User:Raedor\|raedor]] 20:56, 30 July 2006 (CEST)~~

	~~-----~~
	~~You misunderstand.........there was a lot of information in the original Scripting Topics that is not present in the Category Scripting Topics.~~

	~~If you look in the present category you will find that it used to refer to Scripting Topics, this information is now redundant and the information it ised to contain is now gone~~

	~~[[User:Planck\|Planck]] 21:00, 30 July 2006 (CEST)~~

	: The page "Scripting Topics" never existed (I can't find it [[Special:Log/delete \| here]]...). Possibly you mean the page "Scripting", but the whole content of this page was copied here. You can check it in the history of the page [http://community.bistudio.com/wiki?title=Scripting&oldid=15594 Scripting]. --[[User:Raedor\|raedor]] 21:06, 30 July 2006 (CEST)

	~~I know it existed because I bviewed it many times~~

	~~In fact either I or bedges included it from the original comref.~~

	~~[[User:Planck\|Planck]] 21:09, 30 July 2006 (CEST)~~

	: Probably you're mixing up something. I can't find the page in any of the [http://community.bistudio.com/wiki?title=Special:Log&type=&user=&page=&limit=500&offset=0 Logs]... :( What did it contain, can you remember certain (special) things? --[[User:Raedor\|raedor]] 21:13, 30 July 2006 (CEST)

	: Maybe you mean that one: [[Script syntax]]? Found it on the [http://community.bistudio.com/wiki?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Scripting "What links here"] page of Scripting.--[[User:Raedor\|raedor]] 21:15, 30 July 2006 (CEST)

	~~-----~~
	~~The page Scripting Topics did exist......there was even a link to it on scripting which was changed from a link to emboldened text.~~

	~~Never mind, althought the information is still there, the blurb on the Scripting Topics category page will no need to be changed.~~

	~~It reads:.......A good place to start would be the Scripting Topics section, link can be found below.~~

	~~When in fact there is no link to be found below.~~

	~~The '''Link''' that used to be found below is now just emboldened text and will also need to be removed as it is no longer a link to the Scripting Topics page.~~

	~~[[User:Planck\|Planck]] 21:24, 30 July 2006 (CEST)~~

	:Okay, I'll remove that sentence. But the "link below" was linking to '''Category:'''Scripting Topics since the third revision, before it did not exist. Go and check it [http://community.bistudio.com/wiki?title=Scripting&action=history here]. --[[User:Raedor\|raedor]] 21:36, 30 July 2006 (CEST)

	~~:Done. --[[User:Raedor\|raedor]] 21:38, 30 July 2006 (CEST)~~

	~~-----~~

	~~I removed the emboldened link as well....all looks peachy now :P~~

	~~[[User:Planck\|Planck]]~~


	~~Good to see we solved that whole issue w/o major losses ;) Fine. :) --[[User:Raedor\|raedor]] 21:42, 30 July 2006 (CEST)~~

	~~-----~~
	~~Str, why are you breaking down the Array operand types for commands into their constituent parts.~~

	~~For example:~~

	~~lbAdd~~
	~~Syntax:~~
	~~lbAdd [idc, text]~~
	~~The comref says 1 (One) operand which is the Array [idc, text]~~

	~~You are breaking down the Array into its 2 parts and saying the command now has 2 operands.~~
	~~The command only has one operand of the Array type.~~
	~~The only makes it all the more confusing in my opinion.~~

	~~You have altered a great number of commands in this way and now they no longer agree with the comref.~~

	~~[[User:Planck\|Planck]] 13:34, 15 September 2006 (CEST)~~

	~~: Isn't it more important what is content of array than array itself? --[[User:Str\|Str]] 13:58, 15 September 2006 (CEST)~~

	~~-----~~

	~~In most cases the format of any array is described in the Description.~~

	~~[[User:Planck\|Planck]] 01:52, 16 September 2006 (CEST)~~

	~~-----~~

	Str, you are simply wrong. The command, by definition, has one operand. That operand may have several components which themselves may be arrays. These arrays may have variable numbers of components depending on the circumstances. Your system is inaccurate, unhelpful, confusing and incorrect. Please correct your mistaken changes. Thank you.

	~~[[User:Macguba\|Macguba]] 14:38, 16 September 2006 (CEST)~~

	~~-----~~
	~~All should be ok now. Sorry for that. --[[User:Str\|Str]] 15:54, 16 September 2006 (CEST)~~

	~~----~~

	~~Tks m8! :-)~~

	~~[[User:Macguba\|Macguba]] 23:41, 16 September 2006 (CEST)~~


	~~----~~

	~~Where can I find concrete information regarding Armed Assault fired object's maximum lifetime (bullets, missiles, LGBs, etc.)?~~

	~~--[[User:Havoc\|Havoc]] 19:02, 5 January 2007 (CET)~~

havocsquad at 18:02, 5 January 2007

2007-01-05T18:02:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 5 January 2007
Line 90:		Line 90:

	[[User:Macguba\|Macguba]] 23:41, 16 September 2006 (CEST)		[[User:Macguba\|Macguba]] 23:41, 16 September 2006 (CEST)


			----

			Where can I find concrete information regarding Armed Assault fired object's maximum lifetime (bullets, missiles, LGBs, etc.)?

			--[[User:Havoc\|Havoc]] 19:02, 5 January 2007 (CET)

Macguba at 21:41, 16 September 2006

2006-09-16T21:41:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 16 September 2006
Line 84:		Line 84:
	-----		-----
	All should be ok now. Sorry for that. --[[User:Str\|Str]] 15:54, 16 September 2006 (CEST)		All should be ok now. Sorry for that. --[[User:Str\|Str]] 15:54, 16 September 2006 (CEST)

			----

			Tks m8! :-)

			[[User:Macguba\|Macguba]] 23:41, 16 September 2006 (CEST)

Str at 13:54, 16 September 2006

2006-09-16T13:54:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 16 September 2006
Line 81:		Line 81:

	[[User:Macguba\|Macguba]] 14:38, 16 September 2006 (CEST)		[[User:Macguba\|Macguba]] 14:38, 16 September 2006 (CEST)

			-----
			All should be ok now. Sorry for that. --[[User:Str\|Str]] 15:54, 16 September 2006 (CEST)

Macguba at 12:38, 16 September 2006

2006-09-16T12:38:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:38, 16 September 2006
Line 79:		Line 79:

	Str, you are simply wrong. The command, by definition, has one operand. That operand may have several components which themselves may be arrays. These arrays may have variable numbers of components depending on the circumstances. Your system is inaccurate, unhelpful, confusing and incorrect. Please correct your mistaken changes. Thank you.		Str, you are simply wrong. The command, by definition, has one operand. That operand may have several components which themselves may be arrays. These arrays may have variable numbers of components depending on the circumstances. Your system is inaccurate, unhelpful, confusing and incorrect. Please correct your mistaken changes. Thank you.

			[[User:Macguba\|Macguba]] 14:38, 16 September 2006 (CEST)

Macguba at 12:35, 16 September 2006

2006-09-16T12:35:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:35, 16 September 2006
Line 75:		Line 75:

	[[User:Planck\|Planck]] 01:52, 16 September 2006 (CEST)		[[User:Planck\|Planck]] 01:52, 16 September 2006 (CEST)

			-----

			Str, you are simply wrong. The command, by definition, has one operand. That operand may have several components which themselves may be arrays. These arrays may have variable numbers of components depending on the circumstances. Your system is inaccurate, unhelpful, confusing and incorrect. Please correct your mistaken changes. Thank you.

Planck at 23:52, 15 September 2006

2006-09-15T23:52:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 16 September 2006
Line 69:		Line 69:

	: Isn't it more important what is content of array than array itself? --[[User:Str\|Str]] 13:58, 15 September 2006 (CEST)		: Isn't it more important what is content of array than array itself? --[[User:Str\|Str]] 13:58, 15 September 2006 (CEST)

			-----

			In most cases the format of any array is described in the Description.

			[[User:Planck\|Planck]] 01:52, 16 September 2006 (CEST)

Str at 11:58, 15 September 2006

2006-09-15T11:58:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:58, 15 September 2006
Line 67:		Line 67:

	[[User:Planck\|Planck]] 13:34, 15 September 2006 (CEST)		[[User:Planck\|Planck]] 13:34, 15 September 2006 (CEST)

			: Isn't it more important what is content of array than array itself? --[[User:Str\|Str]] 13:58, 15 September 2006 (CEST)

Planck at 11:35, 15 September 2006

2006-09-15T11:35:07Z

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 : Probably you're mixing up something. I can't find the page in any of the [http://community.bistudio.com/wiki?title=Special:Log&type=&user=&page=&limit=500&offset=0 Logs]... :( What did it contain, can you remember certain (special) things? --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 21:13, 30 July 2006 (CEST)
 : Maybe you mean that one: [[Script syntax]]? Found it on the [http://community.bistudio.com/wiki?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Scripting "What links here"] page of Scripting.--[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 21:15, 30 July 2006 (CEST)
@@ Line 68: / Line 49: @@
 Good to see we solved that whole issue w/o major losses ;) Fine. :) --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 21:42, 30 July 2006 (CEST)

Planck at 11:34, 15 September 2006

2006-09-15T11:34:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 15 September 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:

	: Probably you're mixing up something. I can't find the page in any of the [http://community.bistudio.com/wiki?title=Special:Log&type=&user=&page=&limit=500&offset=0 Logs]... :( What did it contain, can you remember certain (special) things? --[[User:Raedor\|raedor]] 21:13, 30 July 2006 (CEST)		: Probably you're mixing up something. I can't find the page in any of the [http://community.bistudio.com/wiki?title=Special:Log&type=&user=&page=&limit=500&offset=0 Logs]... :( What did it contain, can you remember certain (special) things? --[[User:Raedor\|raedor]] 21:13, 30 July 2006 (CEST)

			Str, why are you breaking down the Array operand types for commands into their constituent parts.

			For example:

			lbAdd
			Syntax:
			lbAdd [idc, text]
			The comref says 1 (One) operand which is the Array [idc, text]

			You are breaking down the Array into its 2 parts and saying the command now has 2 operands.
			The command only has one operand of the Array type.
			The only makes it all the more confusing in my opinion.

			You have altered a great number of commands in this way and now they no longer agree with the comref.

			[[User:Planck\|Planck]] 13:34, 15 September 2006 (CEST)



	: Maybe you mean that one: [[Script syntax]]? Found it on the [http://community.bistudio.com/wiki?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Scripting "What links here"] page of Scripting.--[[User:Raedor\|raedor]] 21:15, 30 July 2006 (CEST)		: Maybe you mean that one: [[Script syntax]]? Found it on the [http://community.bistudio.com/wiki?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Scripting "What links here"] page of Scripting.--[[User:Raedor\|raedor]] 21:15, 30 July 2006 (CEST)