View source for Talk:ArmA: Armed Assault: Easter Eggs

Aren't we getting a bit too broad with our definition of Easter Eggs? I mean, they are ''not'' supposed to be stuff that's in plain sight, and visible to anybody at any time. There's supposed to be some ''searching'' involved before you can call something an Easter Egg...

Half of the items listed here would not meet the commonly accepted [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_egg_%28media%29 definition], and I would suggest removing them. --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 18:54, 4 February 2007 (CET)

:I agree. --[[User:Messiah2|Messiah(UA)]] 15:32, 5 February 2007 (CET)

::If one adheres to the strict definition, one would have to remove all of the Operation Flashpoint Easter Eggs as well, except for the christmas trees, which are hidden in the code. So far, I think most of the items listed now are definitely worth knowing. Besides, most of the items have not been fully described yet, so I am really curious to see other users' input in this category. --[[User:[[User:Redface|Redface]]|[[User:Redface|Redface]]]] 16:15, 5 February 2007 (CET)

:::I have removed all the items that are not Easter Eggs by ''any definition''. Things that don't require ''any'' searching whatsoever just don't belong here.<br>Feel free to open a new page with "Funny or strange sightings in Arma" (or whatever you want to name it), but these things that are in plain sight are definitely ''not'' Easter Eggs. --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 17:07, 9 February 2007 (CET)