Hardrock/Sandbox – User talk

Latest revision as of 04:00, 3 December 2018

The edit button on the far right is messed up. It always crosses the section line and only in the first section. hoz

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Scripting Command Templates ==
-What do you think of these templates for the scripting commands? I think we need some way to display more information in a standardized way . . . --[[User:Hardrock|hardrock]] 23:33, 26 July 2006 (CEST)
+The edit button on the far right is messed up. It always crosses the section line and only in the first section. [[User:Hoz|hoz]]
-I like it :) --[[User:T D|T_D]] 23:47, 26 July 2006 (CEST)
-:I like option 1. Not fond of the green tho. But I like how the information is organised and I can see how it would help with consistency. [[User:Hoz|hoz]] 00:10, 27 July 2006 (CEST)
-:With 777 commands it will be no easy fate. :) [[User:Hoz|hoz]] 00:46, 27 July 2006 (CEST)
-:Let's gather ten people, if everyone does one command per day we're done in 77 days... --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 00:50, 27 July 2006 (CEST)
-:Definitely Option 1; is it possible to have the "edit"-Links, as in Option 2 for the diverse sections? --[[User:Vektorboson|Vektorboson]] 01:06, 27 July 2006 (CEST)
-::Don't know whether that's possible. The good thing about option two is, that it uses Wiki's Default syntax. There's no table and nothing, so you can adapt it easily for special commands, which is not the case with the first one. --[[User:Hardrock|hardrock]] 01:12, 27 July 2006 (CEST)
-:::Which special commands won't work in the template?   Also I was thinking the top part of the information is likely never to change. Only the comments, examples sections perhaps both of best worlds would work.[[User:Hoz|hoz]] 01:35, 27 July 2006 (CEST)
-::::I have another idea now. I'll adapt option 2 so that it looks like option 1 :-) At least try it. --[[User:Hardrock|hardrock]] 01:41, 27 July 2006 (CEST)

Hardrock/Sandbox – User talk

Latest revision as of 04:00, 3 December 2018

Navigation menu

Search