Easter Eggs – ArmA: Armed Assault Talk
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I agree. --[[User:Messiah2|Messiah(UA)]] 15:32, 5 February 2007 (CET) | I agree. --[[User:Messiah2|Messiah(UA)]] 15:32, 5 February 2007 (CET) | ||
If one adheres to the strict definition, one would have to remove all of the Operation Flashpoint Easter Eggs as well, except for the christmas trees, which are hidden in the code. So far, I think most of the items listed now are definitely worth knowing. Besides, most of the items have not been fully described yet, so I am really curious to see other users' input in this category. --[[User:[[User:Redface|Redface]]|[[User:Redface|Redface]]]] 16:15, 5 February 2007 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 16:21, 5 February 2007
Aren't we getting a bit too broad with our definition of Easter Eggs? I mean, they are not supposed to be stuff that's in plain sight, and visible to anybody at any time. There's supposed to be some searching involved before you can call something an Easter Egg...
Half of the items listed here would not meet the commonly accepted definition, and I would suggest removing them. --Kronzky 18:54, 4 February 2007 (CET)
I agree. --Messiah(UA) 15:32, 5 February 2007 (CET)
If one adheres to the strict definition, one would have to remove all of the Operation Flashpoint Easter Eggs as well, except for the christmas trees, which are hidden in the code. So far, I think most of the items listed now are definitely worth knowing. Besides, most of the items have not been fully described yet, so I am really curious to see other users' input in this category. --[[User:Redface|Redface]] 16:15, 5 February 2007 (CET)