BTS Instructions – Talk
Categories: 
mNo edit summary  | 
				m (Confirmed)  | 
				||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:::We should, yes. ;) --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 21:40, 13 March 2007 (CET)  | :::We should, yes. ;) --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 21:40, 13 March 2007 (CET)  | ||
== Confirmed ==  | |||
What does "confirmed" realy mean? Some people think it is something like Acknowledged, I think it is when fix is verified and the bug is confirmed to be fixed, therefore the bug is ready to be closed. --[[User:Suma|Suma]] 16:38, 19 March 2007 (CET)  | |||
Revision as of 16:38, 19 March 2007
Link on Bugtracker page
I've linked this page on http://bugs.armed-assault.net/main_page.php --Boecko 22:57, 16 February 2007 (CET)
Severity
What are we going to do with the "Severity" option? Will this be handled as it is now, that regular reporters only file it under a default status, and then a sysop will assign it a priority (that's how I documented it for now)?
And I guess we will have to adjust our current priorities to the new classes. --Kronzky 20:19, 17 February 2007 (CET)
- Priorities adjusted. Severity should be adjusted by sysops, as also priority. --raedor 13:46, 9 March 2007 (CET)
 
- shouldn't we integrate the priorities on BTS Guidelines --Boecko 13:00, 12 March 2007 (CET)
 
- We should, yes. ;) --raedor 21:40, 13 March 2007 (CET)
 
Confirmed
What does "confirmed" realy mean? Some people think it is something like Acknowledged, I think it is when fix is verified and the bug is confirmed to be fixed, therefore the bug is ready to be closed. --Suma 16:38, 19 March 2007 (CET)