BIS File Formats – Category talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We should | We should distinguish between file extensions and file formats. I am not sure if file extensions should be a subcategory of BIS File Formats --[[User:T D|T_D]] 14:30, 22 November 2008 (CET) | ||
:The title "8WVR File Format" means nothing | |||
:For my money, it should be called WRP File Format - 8WVR | |||
:similarly ODOL V40, should be P3D File Format - ODOLV40 etc... | |||
:this nomenclature breaks down of course for the Rap file formats etc, but the use of file formats which are endemic only to a certain sort of file extension, should be declared as such to make it much more intuitive to the reader. | |||
:with four current formats for p3d, the format, should be a '''subcategory''' of the consistent file extension imho | |||
:[[User:Mikero|Mikero (nee Ook?)]] 01:55, 8 January 2009 (CET) | |||
::Sounds good to me.--[[User:WGL.Q|PROPER Q]] 09:52, 9 January 2009 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:52, 9 January 2009
We should distinguish between file extensions and file formats. I am not sure if file extensions should be a subcategory of BIS File Formats --T_D 14:30, 22 November 2008 (CET)
- The title "8WVR File Format" means nothing
- For my money, it should be called WRP File Format - 8WVR
- similarly ODOL V40, should be P3D File Format - ODOLV40 etc...
- this nomenclature breaks down of course for the Rap file formats etc, but the use of file formats which are endemic only to a certain sort of file extension, should be declared as such to make it much more intuitive to the reader.
- with four current formats for p3d, the format, should be a subcategory of the consistent file extension imho
- Mikero (nee Ook?) 01:55, 8 January 2009 (CET)
- Sounds good to me.--PROPER Q 09:52, 9 January 2009 (CET)