SafeZone – Talk

From Bohemia Interactive Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Shouldnt it be safeZone for all commands regarding that? I.e. safeZoneX, safeZoneY, safeZoneW, safeZoneH ??
Shouldnt it be safeZone for all commands regarding that? I.e. safeZoneX, safeZoneY, safeZoneW, safeZoneH ??
So it correlates with BIS other naming of commands? --[[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 00:47, 10 June 2009 (CEST)
So it correlates with BIS other naming of commands? --[[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 00:47, 10 June 2009 (CEST)


SafeZone is the area.
SafeZone is the area.
SafeZoneX and the orther are functions to return the size of this area for me.
SafeZoneX and the orther are functions to return the size of this area for me.
--[[User:HeliJunkie|HeliJunkie]] 21:04, 9 June 2009 (CEST)
--[[User:HeliJunkie|HeliJunkie]] 21:04, 9 June 2009 (CEST)


True, thats not what i meant... all commands from BIS seem to begin with a small letter, but with SafeZoneX etc.. its seems they deviated from this 'tradition'. Why? Is there a important reason? Or is it just a typo?
True, thats not what i meant... all commands from BIS seem to begin with a small letter, but with SafeZoneX etc.. its seems they deviated from this 'tradition'. Why? Is there a important reason? Or is it just a typo?
PS: Thanks HeliJunkie for the signature shortcut hint! :)
PS: Thanks HeliJunkie for the signature shortcut hint! :)
--[[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 00:45, 10 June 2009 (CEST)
--[[User:Vigilante|Vigilante]] 00:45, 10 June 2009 (CEST)

Revision as of 00:52, 10 June 2009

Shouldnt it be safeZone for all commands regarding that? I.e. safeZoneX, safeZoneY, safeZoneW, safeZoneH ?? So it correlates with BIS other naming of commands? --Vigilante 00:47, 10 June 2009 (CEST)

SafeZone is the area. SafeZoneX and the orther are functions to return the size of this area for me. --HeliJunkie 21:04, 9 June 2009 (CEST)

True, thats not what i meant... all commands from BIS seem to begin with a small letter, but with SafeZoneX etc.. its seems they deviated from this 'tradition'. Why? Is there a important reason? Or is it just a typo? PS: Thanks HeliJunkie for the signature shortcut hint! :) --Vigilante 00:45, 10 June 2009 (CEST)