|
|
| (56 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| hello Kronzky
| |
|
| |
|
| i have to add you a thought here, based on:
| |
| http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Talk:setVariable
| |
| "Hellooooo... This is a Wiki, not a forum, in case you people forgot."
| |
|
| |
| maybe i am wrong, but i can see a VERY important discussion here going.
| |
| what is the reason to stop it?
| |
|
| |
| its the best place to do it. everyone can participate, everyone can see it.
| |
| even the developers think its important.
| |
|
| |
| so keep cool mate --[[User:WGL.Q|WGL.Q]] 19:59, 15 August 2006 (CEST)
| |
|
| |
| :I agree that it's a very important and interesting discussion, and that's exactly why a command's talk page isn't the best place for it.
| |
| :Talk pages aren't designed to handle lots of traffic. They are purged frequently to make room for new discussions, and at that point - unless sombody incorporates the result of the discussion into the article - all those interesting arguments will basically vanish.
| |
| :The main purpose of a Wiki is to ''present'' information, not to ''discover'' it. Forums are much better suited for those discussions, since they have navigational and search mechanisms, and are preserved for a long time. (None of which applies to Wiki talk pages.) --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 20:26, 15 August 2006 (CEST)
| |
|
| |
| ::BIS Forum isnt the place for it - only here decent people still like to talk as the wiki scares the public crowd off.
| |
| ::This is probably still a topic for the release version of ArmA. The topic will hopefully (at least partially) become obsolete with the ArmA release or a future patch.
| |
| ::One can make exceptions for the sake of usefulness, right? --[[User:WGL.Q|WGL.Q]] 21:44, 15 August 2006 (CEST)
| |
