skill name – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(merging variations) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think this command is surplus to requirements as it seems to be a duplicate of '''skill vehicle'''. | I think this command is surplus to requirements as it seems to be a duplicate of '''skill vehicle'''. | ||
[[User:Planck|Planck]] 17:43, 23 February 2010 (CET) | [[User:Planck|Planck]] 17:43, 23 February 2010 (CET) | ||
:At the moment we have other "homonym" commands with separate pages (eg: count, createUnit, createVehicle, hintC, setSkill). Should they all be merged too? --[[User:Ceeeb|Ceeeb]] 22:16, 24 February 2010 (CET) | |||
::I had done some major merging a while ago, but I guess there are still a few I had overlooked. | |||
::So, yes, ideally there should only be one article per command, with alternative syntax used inside that article. | |||
::The only problem is that the article template only support ''one'' alternative syntax, and we have some cases where there are three possible variations. So, in those cases we might have to leave two articles, or find a way of explaining the variations within the argument description itself. | |||
::--[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 19:19, 25 February 2010 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:19, 25 February 2010
I think this command is surplus to requirements as it seems to be a duplicate of skill vehicle. Planck 17:43, 23 February 2010 (CET)
- At the moment we have other "homonym" commands with separate pages (eg: count, createUnit, createVehicle, hintC, setSkill). Should they all be merged too? --Ceeeb 22:16, 24 February 2010 (CET)
- I had done some major merging a while ago, but I guess there are still a few I had overlooked.
- So, yes, ideally there should only be one article per command, with alternative syntax used inside that article.
- The only problem is that the article template only support one alternative syntax, and we have some cases where there are three possible variations. So, in those cases we might have to leave two articles, or find a way of explaining the variations within the argument description itself.
- --Kronzky 19:19, 25 February 2010 (CET)