BIS fnc trimString: Difference between revisions
| mNo edit summary | Lou Montana (talk | contribs)  m (Some wiki formatting) | ||
| (37 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{RV|type=function | |||
| |game1= arma3 | |||
| |version1= 1.00 | |||
| |  | |gr1= Strings | ||
| | | |descr= Get a substring out of the string. | ||
| {{Feature|arma3|Use [[select#Alternative Syntax 3|select]] instead.}} | |||
| |  | |s1= [someText, beginning, length] call [[BIS_fnc_trimString]] | ||
| |p1= someText: [[String]] - source string | |||
| |p2= beginning: [[Number]] (Optional, default 0) - start index; indexing starts at 0 | |||
| |p3= length: [[Number]] (Optional, default end of string) - end index. A negative number means X chars ''from the string end'' | |||
| |r1= [[String]] | |||
| |x1= <sqf>["dreaded_is_the_man", 0, 6] call BIS_fnc_trimString;	// will return "dreaded"</sqf> | |||
| < | |x2= <sqf>["dreaded_is_the_man", 15] call BIS_fnc_trimString;	// will return "man"</sqf> | ||
| | < | |x3= <sqf>["dreaded_is_the_man"] call BIS_fnc_trimString;		// will return "dreaded_is_the_man"</sqf> | ||
| | | |seealso= [[select]] | ||
| }} | |||
| | |=  | {{Note | ||
| |user= R3vo | |||
| |timestamp= 20170824154500 | |||
| |text= <sqf> | |||
| "test" select [0, 4];						// 0.0007 ms | |||
| ["test", 0, 4] call BIS_fnc_trimString;	// 0.013 ms | |||
| </sqf> | |||
| The first method is about '''18 times faster'''. | |||
| }} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:38, 13 May 2023
Description
Syntax
- Syntax:
- [someText, beginning, length] call BIS_fnc_trimString
- Parameters:
- someText: String - source string
- beginning: Number (Optional, default 0) - start index; indexing starts at 0
- length: Number (Optional, default end of string) - end index. A negative number means X chars from the string end
- Return Value:
- String
Examples
- Example 1:
- Example 2:
- Example 3:
Additional Information
- See also:
- select
Notes
- 
Report bugs on the Feedback Tracker and/or discuss them on the Arma Discord or on the Forums.
 Only post proven facts here! Add Note
- Posted on Aug 24, 2017 - 15:45 (UTC)
- The first method is about 18 times faster.
 
	
