News Websites – Talk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(VBS OK?) |
m (→VBS OK?: comment.) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
So, can we list VBS sites here? Despite [[User talk:Raedor | Raedor's comment]]? --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 23:29, 21 July 2006 (CEST) | So, can we list VBS sites here? Despite [[User talk:Raedor | Raedor's comment]]? --[[User:Kronzky|Kronzky]] 23:29, 21 July 2006 (CEST) | ||
:: Raedor is correct those guidelines were writting by BI we should stick by them. However I did check out the site and they also carry ArmA news. No reason why they couldn't be listed under ArmA? [[User:Hoz|hoz]] 03:23, 22 July 2006 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 02:23, 22 July 2006
about alphabetical: I think its better, writes and sorts by site-language.
example:
English ArmedurlAssault.com
English ArmedurlAssault.net
English ArmedurlAssault.org
French ArmA.fr
French ArmedurlAssalt.fr
German ArmedurlAssault.at
German ArmedurlAssault.de
Italian ArmedurlAssault.com
Italian ArmedurlAssault.it
Polish ArmAsite.pl
Polish ArmedurlAssault.bla
Russian ArmedurlAssault.bla
I think it´s better as to the URL or the description. Only i a idea..
btw: why deleted the url armedassaults.de ??
//toster
- go right ahead, perhaps subsectioning based on language is best. hoz 17:08, 21 July 2006 (CEST)
Heavy decisions...
Some is certainly wrong... But who does not make anything can nothing make wrong. :D - i hope thats ok. //toster
VBS OK?
So, can we list VBS sites here? Despite Raedor's comment? --Kronzky 23:29, 21 July 2006 (CEST)
- Raedor is correct those guidelines were writting by BI we should stick by them. However I did check out the site and they also carry ArmA news. No reason why they couldn't be listed under ArmA? hoz 03:23, 22 July 2006 (CEST)