Init.sqs – Talk

Revision as of 01:34, 13 February 2007

An init.sqf file may be used instead of the init.sqs. Not sure if the article should be moved or just added to. --pyro05x 07:59, 7 February 2007 (CET)

Add it, as the init.sqs is still working. :) --raedor 15:24, 7 February 2007 (CET)

And if there're both sqs&sqf what happens ? What is executed first ? --bdfy

I don't know, test it :P --raedor 23:35, 7 February 2007 (CET)

Just tried it and it seems SQF is executed first. ++Str 15:17, 8 February 2007 (CET)

First or only? --Ceeeb

First. Executed are both of them. ++Str 16:13, 8 February 2007 (CET)

so the execution of the init.sqs is delayed until init.sqf is done? --pyro05x 01:33, 13 February 2007 (CET)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-An init.sqf file may be used instead of the init.sqs.  Not sure if the article should be moved or just added to. --[[User:Pyro05x|Pyro05x]] 07:59, 7 February 2007 (CET)
+An init.sqf file may be used instead of the init.sqs.  Not sure if the article should be moved or just added to. --[[User:pyro05x|pyro05x]] 07:59, 7 February 2007 (CET)
 :Add it, as the init.sqs is still working. :) --[[User:Raedor|raedor]] 15:24, 7 February 2007 (CET)
 And if there're both sqs&sqf what happens ? What is executed first ? --[[User:bdfy|bdfy]]
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ::: First or only? --[[User:Ceeeb|Ceeeb]]
 :::: First. Executed are both of them. ++[[User:Str|Str]] 16:13, 8 February 2007 (CET)
-::::: so the execution of the init.sqs is delayed until init.sqf is done? --[[User:Pyro05x|Pyro05x]] 01:33, 13 February 2007 (CET)
+::::: so the execution of the init.sqs is delayed until init.sqf is done? --[[User:pyro05x|pyro05x]] 01:33, 13 February 2007 (CET)